Tuesday, December 31, 2013
Iran’s Virtual Reality – Politicians Are Active on Twitter and Facebook!
“Hello world, we are tweeting without restrictions from Iran”
With this enticing tweet, Dutch journalist Thomas Erdbrink announced from the capital of Iran that Iranians would be able to post on Twitter and Facebook.
However, a day later the digital freedom seemed to be the result of a “technical malfunctioning”.
Social media is a delicate topic for Iranian authorities. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani proclaimed during his election that he wanted to open up internet access. Rouhani himself has an active Twitter account (@HassanRouhani). He tweets in English and Farsi.
The Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs Javad Zarif is also on Twitter (@JZarif) and is also active on Facebook.
These two politicians follow in the footsteps of many diplomats and politicians around the globe who have been using social media to explain their views or promote their agenda.
Sometimes politicians even slug it out in cyberspace. The Swedish Minister of Foreign Affairs Carl Bildt @CarlBildt and the Egyptian Ambassador in Sweden disputed how many demonstrators were killed by Egyptian forces, with the Swede tweeting: “@Osama_Elmagdoub So they all shoot themselves? Try another one”.
No matter what, the recent tweets of Rouhani and Zarif are groundbreaking. Even Ayatollah Khamenei (@Khamenei_ir) wants to communicate with the outside world via social media.
Zarif even used twitter on September 5 to wish Jews a Happy New Year @JZarif “Happy Rosh Rashanah” – quite ironic since the previous Iranian President denied the Holocaust. Rouhani claims that “We never denied it. The man who was perceived to be denying is now gone. Happy new year.” Quod erat demonstrandum (QED).
It would be great if the tweets would indicate a new era of freedom. I would love Iran to confront @BarackObama in cyberspace. Who knows – social media couls even contribute to peace!
It’s hard to prevent people to go online and connect with whoever they want across the globe. Even with restrictions, there are ways to circumvent censorship, so just go with the flow! I’m sure the NSA agrees with me…
(Image courtesy of: © kebox - Fotolia.com)
Monday, December 30, 2013
What did Dutch People Google in 2013?
For marketers and advertisers, it’s always important to know what your target audience is interested in. Data from search engines are particular valuable.
If your target audience is located in the Netherlands, the following might be of interest. Google Netherlands has just released its “Zeitgeist” report – an overview of the most popular search terms.
Summary
'Facebook' was the most googled term – in combination with a name
The most popular search was “:How?” in the context of “how long pregnant?” Also “How does blood doping work?” and “How does sewerage work?” scored high.
As for sports, “Ajax” was the most popular soccer club and googled on internet, and “Rafael van der Vaart” was the most googled, as was his celebrity-girlfriend “Sabia Bouhlarouz”. Fast and Furious star Paul Walker was also googled a lot after he got killed in a speeding accident.
Funny enough, one of the most popular search term is becoming “cenosillicaphobia” aka “fear of an empty glass, particularly an empty beer glass”.
“Black Peter” was the most googled image on Google, due to the character’s perceived racism. It scored higher than the Dutch king Willem-Alexander, who in turn scored higher than image searches for “bbq”, “big smooch” and “tick”. Go figure!
Based on googled terms. The Dutch just love to celebrate the Queen’s Birthday, which could be related to the coronation of the new king.
As for entertainment, the Dutch love to go to the “Efteling” for a daytrip and to IKEA for shopping (or eating).
“Albert Heijn” is the most googled supermarket, as is “Aldi”. ‘BMW” is the most googled car.
Most Googled in 2013
1.Facebook
2. Marktplaats (Market place – an online shopping portal))
3. YouTube
4. Hotmail
5. Google
6. Buienradar (Shower radar – a weather website))
7. Telegraaf (Telegraph – a newspaper)
8. ING (International Netherlands Group - a major bank)
9. NU.nl (now – an online magazine)
10. Rabobank
Trending in 2013
1. Paul Walker
2. Koningslied (The King’s Song, composed for the coronation of Willem-Alexander)
3. Outlook
4. GTA5 (Grand Theft Auto V – a video game)
5. Netflix
6. iOS7
7. Cenosillicaphobia (see above)
8. Queen’s Birthday 2013 (see above)
9. iPhone 5s
10. Carnaval 2013
Most Popular Google Searches for People
1. Paul Walker
2. Sabia Boulahrouz
3. Anouk
4. Zwarte Piet (Black Peter)
5. Nelson Mandela
6. Cory Monteith
7. Badr Hari
8. Gaby Hingst
9. Freek Vonk
10. Kate Middleton
Trending Images
1. Zwarte Piet (Black Peter)
2. Willem Alexander (current Dutch king)
3. Valentijnsdag (Valentine’s Day)
4. 2013
5. Gefeliciteerd (Congratulations)
6. Bbq
7. Vraagteken (Question mark)
8. Dikke Kus (big smooch)
9. Roos (Rose)
10. Teek(Tick)
Entertainment
TV Programs
1. Under The Dome
2. Penoza
3. Cheat On Me
4. Divorce
5. Hollywood Heights
6. Everybody Dance Now
7. Danni Lowinski
8. X Factor
9. Achter Gesloten Deuren (Behind closed doors)
10. Geordie Shore
Films
1. Django Unchained
2. Verliefd Op Ibiza (In love on Ibiza, Spain)
3. Life Of Pi
4. The Great Gatsby
5. The Conjuring
6. Argo
7. After Earth
8. Man Of Steel
9. The Impossible
10. Oblivion Politics
Dutch Politicians
1. Mark Rutte
2. Frans Timmermans
3. Jet Bussemaker
4. Jeroen Dijsselbloem
5. Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert
6. Fred Teeven
7. Sander Dekker
8. Edith Schippers
9. Lodewijk Asscher
10. Henk Kamp
International Political Leaders
1. Obama
2. Cameron
3. Kerry
4. Putin
5. Berlusconi
6. Harper
7. Merkel
8. Assad
9. Hollande
10. Mansour
Dutch Political Parties
1. SP
2. PvdA
3. VVD
4. CDA
5. PVV
6. D66
7. SGP
8. GroenLinks
9. 50plus
10. ChristenUnie
Dutch Royalty
1. Koningslied
2. Koninginnedag 2013
3. Prinsjesdag 2013
4. Troonswisseling / inhuldiging Willem-Alexander / Kroning
5. Koningsspelen
6. Koningsdag
7. Abdication
8. Troonrede 2013
9. Royal baby
10. Funeral Friso
Royalty
1. Kate Middleton
2. Willem-Alexander
3. Amalia
4. Beatrix
5. Prince Friso
6. Queen Maxima
7. KingAlbert
8. Prince Phiilip
9. Prince Bernhard Junior
10. Princess Alexia
Knowledge
How Does It Work?
1. Hoe Werkt Tinder (How does Tinder work)
2. Hoe Werkt Netflix (How does Netflix work)
3. Hoe Werkt Snapchat (How does Snapchat work)
4. Hoe Werkt Path (How does Path work)
5. Hoe Werkt Riolering (How does sewerage work)
6. Hoe Werkt Wetransfer (How does wet transfer work)
7. Hoe Werkt Bloeddoping( How does blood doping work)
8. Hoe Werkt Minecraft (How does Minecraft work)
9. Hoe Werkt Passbook (How does Passbook work)
10. Hoe Werkt Prezi (How does Prezi work)
How?
1. Hoe Lang Zwanger (How long pregnant)
2. Hoe Werkt Paypal (how does Paypal work)
3. Hoe Werkt Twitter (how does Twitter work)
4. Hoe Werkt Facebook (how does Facebook work)
5. Hoe Werkt Skype (how does Skype work)
6. Hoe Schrijf Je (How do you write)
7. Hoe Lang WW (Hoe long is unemployment)
8. Hoe Werkt Whatsapp (How does Whatsupp work)
9. Hoe Werkt Dropbox (How does Dropbox work)
10. Hoe Werkt Spotify (How does Spotify work)
Technology
Trending new technology
1. Outlook
2. Netfilx
3. iOS7
4. iPhone 5s / 5c
5. Samsung galaxy s4
6. Huawei
7. Path
8. Windows 8.1
9. Tinder
10. BitcoinVoetbal (Bitcoin soccer)
Top-10 Dutch Soccer Clubs
1. Ajax
2. Feyenoord
3. PSV
4. AZ
5. Vitesse
6. FC Twente
7. NEC
8. FC Utrecht
9. FC Groningen
10. PEC Zwolle
Soccer Players
1. Rafael van der Vaart
2. Wesley Sneijder
3. Arjen Robben
4. Robin van Persie
5. Daley Blind
6. Memphis Depay
7. Leroy Fer
8. Gregory van der Wiel
9. Kevin Strootman
10. Dirk Kuyt
Events
Dutch Celebrations
1. Koninginnedag (Queen’s Birthday)
2. Carnaval
3. Pasen (Eastern)
4. Herfstvakantie (Autumn Vacation)
5. Vaderdag (Father’s Day)
6. Pinksterdag (Whitsunday)
7. Moederdag (Mother’s Day)
8. Hemelvaart (Ascention Day)
9. Ramadan
10. Goede Vrijdag (Good Friday)
Music Festivals and Concerts
1. Songfestival
2. Pinkpop
3. Toppers
4. Tomorrowland
5. Junior Songfestival
6. Beyonce Ziggo Dome
7. Defqon
8. Zwarte Cross
9. Lowlands
10. Parkpop
Theme Parks
1. Efteling
2. Walibi
3. Duinrell
4. Disneyland Parijs
5. Dolfinarium
6. Toverland
7. Madurodam
8. Plopsaland
9. Drievliet
10. Ponypark Slagharen
Brands
1. IKEA
2. Mediamarkt
3. H&M
4. Hema
5. Bijenkorf
6. Kruidvat
7. Gamma
8. Blokker
9. Praxis
10. AH
Cars
1. BMW
2. Ford
3. Audi
4. Opel
5. Volvo
6. Peugeot
7. Renault
8. Volkswagen
9. Toyota
10. Fiat
Supermarkets
1. Albert Heijn
2. Lidl
3. Jumbo
4. C1000
5. Aldi
6. Hoogvliet
7. Coop
8. Dekamarkt
9. Dirk van den Broek
10. Spar
Dating Sites
1. Badoo
2. Relatieplanet
3. Lexa
4. Pepper
5. AdultMatch
6. Tinder
7. Relatie.nl
8. Homodate
9. Singles Eindhoven
10. Second Love
If your target audience is located in the Netherlands, the following might be of interest. Google Netherlands has just released its “Zeitgeist” report – an overview of the most popular search terms.
Summary
'Facebook' was the most googled term – in combination with a name
The most popular search was “:How?” in the context of “how long pregnant?” Also “How does blood doping work?” and “How does sewerage work?” scored high.
As for sports, “Ajax” was the most popular soccer club and googled on internet, and “Rafael van der Vaart” was the most googled, as was his celebrity-girlfriend “Sabia Bouhlarouz”. Fast and Furious star Paul Walker was also googled a lot after he got killed in a speeding accident.
Funny enough, one of the most popular search term is becoming “cenosillicaphobia” aka “fear of an empty glass, particularly an empty beer glass”.
“Black Peter” was the most googled image on Google, due to the character’s perceived racism. It scored higher than the Dutch king Willem-Alexander, who in turn scored higher than image searches for “bbq”, “big smooch” and “tick”. Go figure!
Based on googled terms. The Dutch just love to celebrate the Queen’s Birthday, which could be related to the coronation of the new king.
As for entertainment, the Dutch love to go to the “Efteling” for a daytrip and to IKEA for shopping (or eating).
“Albert Heijn” is the most googled supermarket, as is “Aldi”. ‘BMW” is the most googled car.
Most Googled in 2013
1.Facebook
2. Marktplaats (Market place – an online shopping portal))
3. YouTube
4. Hotmail
5. Google
6. Buienradar (Shower radar – a weather website))
7. Telegraaf (Telegraph – a newspaper)
8. ING (International Netherlands Group - a major bank)
9. NU.nl (now – an online magazine)
10. Rabobank
Trending in 2013
1. Paul Walker
2. Koningslied (The King’s Song, composed for the coronation of Willem-Alexander)
3. Outlook
4. GTA5 (Grand Theft Auto V – a video game)
5. Netflix
6. iOS7
7. Cenosillicaphobia (see above)
8. Queen’s Birthday 2013 (see above)
9. iPhone 5s
10. Carnaval 2013
Most Popular Google Searches for People
1. Paul Walker
2. Sabia Boulahrouz
3. Anouk
4. Zwarte Piet (Black Peter)
5. Nelson Mandela
6. Cory Monteith
7. Badr Hari
8. Gaby Hingst
9. Freek Vonk
10. Kate Middleton
Trending Images
1. Zwarte Piet (Black Peter)
2. Willem Alexander (current Dutch king)
3. Valentijnsdag (Valentine’s Day)
4. 2013
5. Gefeliciteerd (Congratulations)
6. Bbq
7. Vraagteken (Question mark)
8. Dikke Kus (big smooch)
9. Roos (Rose)
10. Teek(Tick)
Entertainment
TV Programs
1. Under The Dome
2. Penoza
3. Cheat On Me
4. Divorce
5. Hollywood Heights
6. Everybody Dance Now
7. Danni Lowinski
8. X Factor
9. Achter Gesloten Deuren (Behind closed doors)
10. Geordie Shore
Films
1. Django Unchained
2. Verliefd Op Ibiza (In love on Ibiza, Spain)
3. Life Of Pi
4. The Great Gatsby
5. The Conjuring
6. Argo
7. After Earth
8. Man Of Steel
9. The Impossible
10. Oblivion Politics
Dutch Politicians
1. Mark Rutte
2. Frans Timmermans
3. Jet Bussemaker
4. Jeroen Dijsselbloem
5. Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert
6. Fred Teeven
7. Sander Dekker
8. Edith Schippers
9. Lodewijk Asscher
10. Henk Kamp
International Political Leaders
1. Obama
2. Cameron
3. Kerry
4. Putin
5. Berlusconi
6. Harper
7. Merkel
8. Assad
9. Hollande
10. Mansour
Dutch Political Parties
1. SP
2. PvdA
3. VVD
4. CDA
5. PVV
6. D66
7. SGP
8. GroenLinks
9. 50plus
10. ChristenUnie
Dutch Royalty
1. Koningslied
2. Koninginnedag 2013
3. Prinsjesdag 2013
4. Troonswisseling / inhuldiging Willem-Alexander / Kroning
5. Koningsspelen
6. Koningsdag
7. Abdication
8. Troonrede 2013
9. Royal baby
10. Funeral Friso
Royalty
1. Kate Middleton
2. Willem-Alexander
3. Amalia
4. Beatrix
5. Prince Friso
6. Queen Maxima
7. KingAlbert
8. Prince Phiilip
9. Prince Bernhard Junior
10. Princess Alexia
Knowledge
How Does It Work?
1. Hoe Werkt Tinder (How does Tinder work)
2. Hoe Werkt Netflix (How does Netflix work)
3. Hoe Werkt Snapchat (How does Snapchat work)
4. Hoe Werkt Path (How does Path work)
5. Hoe Werkt Riolering (How does sewerage work)
6. Hoe Werkt Wetransfer (How does wet transfer work)
7. Hoe Werkt Bloeddoping( How does blood doping work)
8. Hoe Werkt Minecraft (How does Minecraft work)
9. Hoe Werkt Passbook (How does Passbook work)
10. Hoe Werkt Prezi (How does Prezi work)
How?
1. Hoe Lang Zwanger (How long pregnant)
2. Hoe Werkt Paypal (how does Paypal work)
3. Hoe Werkt Twitter (how does Twitter work)
4. Hoe Werkt Facebook (how does Facebook work)
5. Hoe Werkt Skype (how does Skype work)
6. Hoe Schrijf Je (How do you write)
7. Hoe Lang WW (Hoe long is unemployment)
8. Hoe Werkt Whatsapp (How does Whatsupp work)
9. Hoe Werkt Dropbox (How does Dropbox work)
10. Hoe Werkt Spotify (How does Spotify work)
Technology
Trending new technology
1. Outlook
2. Netfilx
3. iOS7
4. iPhone 5s / 5c
5. Samsung galaxy s4
6. Huawei
7. Path
8. Windows 8.1
9. Tinder
10. BitcoinVoetbal (Bitcoin soccer)
Top-10 Dutch Soccer Clubs
1. Ajax
2. Feyenoord
3. PSV
4. AZ
5. Vitesse
6. FC Twente
7. NEC
8. FC Utrecht
9. FC Groningen
10. PEC Zwolle
Soccer Players
1. Rafael van der Vaart
2. Wesley Sneijder
3. Arjen Robben
4. Robin van Persie
5. Daley Blind
6. Memphis Depay
7. Leroy Fer
8. Gregory van der Wiel
9. Kevin Strootman
10. Dirk Kuyt
Events
Dutch Celebrations
1. Koninginnedag (Queen’s Birthday)
2. Carnaval
3. Pasen (Eastern)
4. Herfstvakantie (Autumn Vacation)
5. Vaderdag (Father’s Day)
6. Pinksterdag (Whitsunday)
7. Moederdag (Mother’s Day)
8. Hemelvaart (Ascention Day)
9. Ramadan
10. Goede Vrijdag (Good Friday)
Music Festivals and Concerts
1. Songfestival
2. Pinkpop
3. Toppers
4. Tomorrowland
5. Junior Songfestival
6. Beyonce Ziggo Dome
7. Defqon
8. Zwarte Cross
9. Lowlands
10. Parkpop
Theme Parks
1. Efteling
2. Walibi
3. Duinrell
4. Disneyland Parijs
5. Dolfinarium
6. Toverland
7. Madurodam
8. Plopsaland
9. Drievliet
10. Ponypark Slagharen
Brands
Newspaper
1. Telegraaf
2. AD
3. Volkskrant
4. NRC
5. De Gelderlander
6. Brabants Dagblad
7. BN de Stem
8. Trouw
9. De Limburger
10. Leeuwarder Courant
Retailers
2. AD
3. Volkskrant
4. NRC
5. De Gelderlander
6. Brabants Dagblad
7. BN de Stem
8. Trouw
9. De Limburger
10. Leeuwarder Courant
Retailers
1. IKEA
2. Mediamarkt
3. H&M
4. Hema
5. Bijenkorf
6. Kruidvat
7. Gamma
8. Blokker
9. Praxis
10. AH
Cars
1. BMW
2. Ford
3. Audi
4. Opel
5. Volvo
6. Peugeot
7. Renault
8. Volkswagen
9. Toyota
10. Fiat
Supermarkets
1. Albert Heijn
2. Lidl
3. Jumbo
4. C1000
5. Aldi
6. Hoogvliet
7. Coop
8. Dekamarkt
9. Dirk van den Broek
10. Spar
Dating Sites
1. Badoo
2. Relatieplanet
3. Lexa
4. Pepper
5. AdultMatch
6. Tinder
7. Relatie.nl
8. Homodate
9. Singles Eindhoven
10. Second Love
Labels:
Ajax,
Albert Heijn,
Aldi,
Black Peter,
Buitenradar,
cenosillicaphobia,
Efteling,
facebook,
google,
IKEA,
ING,
Marktplaats,
Rabobank,
Telegraaf,
Willem-Alexander,
zeitgeist,
Zwarte Piet
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Can RSA and EMC Repair Their Brand Damage Courtesy Of The NSA Scandal?
Reuters broke the story that the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) had inked a confidential contract with RSA, a subsidiary of EMC.
According to Reuters: “Documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden show that the NSA created and promulgated a flawed formula for generating random numbers to create a ‘back door’ in encryption products. RSA received $10 million in a deal that set the NSA formula as the preferred, or default, method for number generation.”
Not a bad deal for RSA, since the company’s total revenue for the previous year was less than $30 million. Needless to say, RSA went into damage control mode by vehemently denying that it ever was in cahoots with the NSA.
RSA did admit that it had worked with the NSA, both as a vendor and an active member of the security community. The EMC-subsidiary emphasized that as a trusted member of the security community, it wants to strengthen, not weaken, encryption.
RSA stated: “This algorithm is only one of multiple choices available within BSafe toolkits. Users have always been free to choose whichever toolkit best suits their needs".
RSA continued using the algorithm as an option within BSafe toolkits as it gained acceptance as a NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) standard and because of its value in FIPS compliance. When concern surfaced around the algorithm in 2007, RSA continued to rely upon NIST as the arbiter of that discussion.
The EMC-subsidiary concluded by stating that RSA, as a security company, never divulges details of customer engagements, but “we also categorically state that we have never entered into any contract or engaged in any project with the intention of weakening RSA’s products, or introducing potential ‘backdoors’ into our products for anyone’s use.”
The fallout of the RSA scandal might be too much for RSA (and EMC). Both companies are at risk to remain tainted by the revelations of Reuters. What RSA and EMC need now is some excellent PR to repair their brand damage – the sooner the better!
According to Reuters: “Documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden show that the NSA created and promulgated a flawed formula for generating random numbers to create a ‘back door’ in encryption products. RSA received $10 million in a deal that set the NSA formula as the preferred, or default, method for number generation.”
Not a bad deal for RSA, since the company’s total revenue for the previous year was less than $30 million. Needless to say, RSA went into damage control mode by vehemently denying that it ever was in cahoots with the NSA.
RSA did admit that it had worked with the NSA, both as a vendor and an active member of the security community. The EMC-subsidiary emphasized that as a trusted member of the security community, it wants to strengthen, not weaken, encryption.
RSA stated: “This algorithm is only one of multiple choices available within BSafe toolkits. Users have always been free to choose whichever toolkit best suits their needs".
RSA continued using the algorithm as an option within BSafe toolkits as it gained acceptance as a NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) standard and because of its value in FIPS compliance. When concern surfaced around the algorithm in 2007, RSA continued to rely upon NIST as the arbiter of that discussion.
The EMC-subsidiary concluded by stating that RSA, as a security company, never divulges details of customer engagements, but “we also categorically state that we have never entered into any contract or engaged in any project with the intention of weakening RSA’s products, or introducing potential ‘backdoors’ into our products for anyone’s use.”
The fallout of the RSA scandal might be too much for RSA (and EMC). Both companies are at risk to remain tainted by the revelations of Reuters. What RSA and EMC need now is some excellent PR to repair their brand damage – the sooner the better!
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
How a PR Executive Put Her Foot in Her Mouth and Got Booted Thanks To Her Racist Tweet
IAC runs popular websites such as www.ask.com, www.about.com, www.match.com, www.dictionary.com, investopedia.com, www.dictionary.com, www.vimeo.com and the Tinder app.
A graduate from Tulane University with a BA in Philosophy, she started her career in 2005 at Dan Klores Communications, followed by working for about a year at The Morris + King Company before moving on to World Wrestling Entertainment. Since 2011, she was working for IAC as a (Senior) Director Corporate Communications in NYC.
Her career ended with one fatal tweet. On her way to South Africa, she tweeted:
"Going to Africa. Hope I don't get AIDS. Just kidding. I'm white!"
The tweet created a firestorm. InterActive Corp decided to fire Ms. Sacco, stating:
"There is no excuse for the hateful statements that have been made and we condemn them unequivocally. We hope, however, that time and action, and the forgiving human spirit, will not result in the wholesale condemnation of an individual who we have otherwise known to be a decent person at core."
The now jobless Sacco went on record saying that she was "ashamed" and released the following apology:
"Words cannot express how sorry I am, and how necessary it is for me to apologize to the people of South Africa, who I have offended due to a needless and careless tweet. There is an AIDS crisis taking place in this country, that we read about in America, but do not live with or face on a continuous basis. Unfortunately, it is terribly easy to be cavalier about an epidemic that one has never witnessed firsthand. For being insensitive to this crisis -- which does not discriminate by race, gender or sexual orientation, but which terrifies us all uniformly -- and to the millions of people living with the virus, I am ashamed. This is my father's country, and I was born here. I cherish my ties to South Africa and my frequent visits, but I am in anguish knowing that my remarks have caused pain to so many people here; my family, friends and fellow South Africans. I am very sorry for the pain I caused."
Personally, I am amazed that a 30-year-old PR professional with her track record could be that stupid in her use of social media.
What are the lessons we can learn?
Everything is on the record
In social media, there is no separation between personal and professional posts – and everything is on the record. If your grandmother would frown upon the content of your post or your worst enemy could use it against you – don’t post!
Be careful with humor
Social media are global, so any joke or "funny" remark you make can be hold against you by minorities or people from different backgrounds, cultures or countries. Be respectful, and in case of doubt, cut the concept out (delete, erase, and empty trash)
React quickly and sincerely
Once you post, it’s a fait accompli. The best thing to do is to apologize – but be sincere! The long and babbling apology of Sacco just does not cut it.
Remember – time is against you, so have to react quickly. Just look at the Duck Dynasty controversy where it took Phil Robertson too long to react.
PR professionals need to be nonstop online
When you work in PR, you need to be online 24/7. Knowledge is indeed power! Part of Sacco’s’ problem was that she was flying (and therefore incommunicado) when all hell broke loose. When unavailable, there are several steps you can take to prevent disaster, such as having a colleague read and tweet on your behalf.
Take care of a proper follow up
Apart from apologizing, Sacco should also follow up with action. In her case, volunteering is a AIDS hospice would be perfect. Assuming that she wants to work in PR ever again, she should write articles (“what I learned from my appropriate tweet” or “The tweet that launched a thousands backlashes”). She also needs to beef up her LinkedIn profile – only one official recommendation is pathetic!
Be aware that you are tainted – and deal with it
Once you’ve reached the level of notoriety of Justine Sacco, you’re tainted. Any web search on “Justine Sacco” does not yield her LinkedIn profile, but coverage of her controversial tweet. Unless she counterbalances it with articles and posts to explain the crisis and how to follow up, she will be toast. Making a public donation or volunteering are excellent ways as well to do damage control.
Corporations need to monitor their employees
It might smell like 1984, but corporations need to monitor what their employees post on Twitter and Facebook as well as (to a lesser extent) on LinkedIn, Pinterest, and Instagram.
A post can harm the brand of a company and even have repercussions if that company is a public one listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ.
The tweet created a firestorm. InterActive Corp decided to fire Ms. Sacco, stating:
"There is no excuse for the hateful statements that have been made and we condemn them unequivocally. We hope, however, that time and action, and the forgiving human spirit, will not result in the wholesale condemnation of an individual who we have otherwise known to be a decent person at core."
The now jobless Sacco went on record saying that she was "ashamed" and released the following apology:
"Words cannot express how sorry I am, and how necessary it is for me to apologize to the people of South Africa, who I have offended due to a needless and careless tweet. There is an AIDS crisis taking place in this country, that we read about in America, but do not live with or face on a continuous basis. Unfortunately, it is terribly easy to be cavalier about an epidemic that one has never witnessed firsthand. For being insensitive to this crisis -- which does not discriminate by race, gender or sexual orientation, but which terrifies us all uniformly -- and to the millions of people living with the virus, I am ashamed. This is my father's country, and I was born here. I cherish my ties to South Africa and my frequent visits, but I am in anguish knowing that my remarks have caused pain to so many people here; my family, friends and fellow South Africans. I am very sorry for the pain I caused."
Personally, I am amazed that a 30-year-old PR professional with her track record could be that stupid in her use of social media.
What are the lessons we can learn?
Everything is on the record
In social media, there is no separation between personal and professional posts – and everything is on the record. If your grandmother would frown upon the content of your post or your worst enemy could use it against you – don’t post!
Be careful with humor
Social media are global, so any joke or "funny" remark you make can be hold against you by minorities or people from different backgrounds, cultures or countries. Be respectful, and in case of doubt, cut the concept out (delete, erase, and empty trash)
React quickly and sincerely
Once you post, it’s a fait accompli. The best thing to do is to apologize – but be sincere! The long and babbling apology of Sacco just does not cut it.
Remember – time is against you, so have to react quickly. Just look at the Duck Dynasty controversy where it took Phil Robertson too long to react.
PR professionals need to be nonstop online
When you work in PR, you need to be online 24/7. Knowledge is indeed power! Part of Sacco’s’ problem was that she was flying (and therefore incommunicado) when all hell broke loose. When unavailable, there are several steps you can take to prevent disaster, such as having a colleague read and tweet on your behalf.
Take care of a proper follow up
Apart from apologizing, Sacco should also follow up with action. In her case, volunteering is a AIDS hospice would be perfect. Assuming that she wants to work in PR ever again, she should write articles (“what I learned from my appropriate tweet” or “The tweet that launched a thousands backlashes”). She also needs to beef up her LinkedIn profile – only one official recommendation is pathetic!
Be aware that you are tainted – and deal with it
Once you’ve reached the level of notoriety of Justine Sacco, you’re tainted. Any web search on “Justine Sacco” does not yield her LinkedIn profile, but coverage of her controversial tweet. Unless she counterbalances it with articles and posts to explain the crisis and how to follow up, she will be toast. Making a public donation or volunteering are excellent ways as well to do damage control.
Corporations need to monitor their employees
It might smell like 1984, but corporations need to monitor what their employees post on Twitter and Facebook as well as (to a lesser extent) on LinkedIn, Pinterest, and Instagram.
A post can harm the brand of a company and even have repercussions if that company is a public one listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ.
Friday, December 20, 2013
Branding Santa – A Hilarious Marketing Lesson from UK Agency Quietroom
Santa Claus has been a household name for centuries, featuring on greeting cards and product packaging, and appearing in ads, movies and TV shows. So what if Santa decided to brand himself like any other enterprise?
The creative minds at Quietroom, a UK branding agency, made a presentation that explains in detail what the new *Santa* brand is all about. But apart from being a wonderful spoof, it also teaches us all the elements of today’s branding policy.
It’s especially useful for anyone working in the field of marketing & PR, graphic design, and even law (just read the legal disclaimers at the bottom of the pages!).
Mission Statement
The first page starts with the mission statement that is as meaningless as many others that are floating around.
"*Santa* is a Concept, not an idea. It's an Emotion, not a feeling. It's both Yesterday and Today. And it's Tomorrow as well.”
The Brand Explained
In the Age of Acronyms, Santa just has to be an acronym!
*Santa* stands for:
* The introductory asterisk reminds customers of a snowflake alighting on the eyelash of a fawn.
SAN The first three letters represent South And North. We are headquartered in the North, but our reach is global.
N The N symbolizes nitrogen, the most abundant atmospheric element, calling to mind the abundance of gifts we distribute.
TA The final two letters are the (abbreviated) thanks of the world’s children.
* The terminating asterisk points to the polar star, and hence the birth of dreams.
Brand Promise
A brand must represent certain values and evoke emotions. That’s why the “brand promise” is explained as follows:
What does *Santa* represent? E(x)cellence, (m)easurability, (a)ccountability and (s)now -(X-mas)
To further explain the brand values, (re)branding presentations contain a bunch of Venn diagrams trying to explain target audience, USP, public image, etc.
In this case, it shows the brand value of Santa, Ho Ho Ho, and Rudolph.
Brand Journey
In this section, the agency or designer tries to explain (justify) the new brand. It is normally an analysis of the history of the brand, competitors and market trends. But what if you don’t have a lot to say? Well, you can go for metaphors…
In this case, they compare Santa to a bird (stork), a river (Danube), a biscuit (Hobnob), and a holiday (Eastern).
Brand Concept
The branding agency or designer normally has a vision about the new brand and how it will work for the entity. Most of the time, they opt for a complicated diagram or illustration that tries to explain the whole (re) brand concept/process in one shot.
In this case, they came up with the Brand House “a brand is a sack on the sleigh of belief”.
Brand Justification
This section “justifies” the (re)designed brand. It tries to explain the added value that the brand will bring to the company/entity.
Logo, Color and Font Use
A logo is part of the corporate or personal brand. Apart from being a differentiator, it is also a major asset. To prevent subsidiaries, subcontractors, resellers and employees to get “creative” and “improve” the logo, a company normally has guidelines (style guide) for using the logo, fonts, colors etc. in place.
Corporate colors and the typeface are also part of a corporate identity. In many cases, designers opt for mixing two pantone colors to create a unique color for the company. The same applies for fonts. Once a company has its own font, it becomes its IP.
In this case, the *Santa* logo cannot be "altered, adjusted, changed, adapted, modified, varied, reformed, revamped, refined, reorientated, transmuted, metamorphosized, customized or tailored in any way."
Tagline, Slogan and Writing Guidelines
Many companies have a tagline to explain its mission. Famous taglines are “Just do it” (Nike), “sense and simplicity” (Philips), and “Got Milk?” (California Milk Processor Board).
*Santa* has its own tagline: “Snap it, Clap it, Wrap it”. It replaces the previous “Meet it, Greet it, Eat it”.
A slogan is designed for branding a specific ad campaign or event. For 2013, Santa’s slogan is “Never Knowingly Undersnowed”.
The writing guidelines instruct marketing and copywriters which phrases to use or avoid, whether writing should be formal or informal, how to use abbreviations, etc.
In this case: *Santa* is: fond of children, generous, round and jolly, and rosy cheeked. *Santa* is not: a bit creepy, a mug, morbidly obese, and half-cut.
Magic Quadrant
The Magic Quadrant (first designed by the Boston Consulting Group) shows how competitors rank by comparing two characteristics. It visualized who the main threats for a company or entity are.
In this case, “Fatiness” and “Beardiness” were used to chart the strengths of potential competitors. Miley Cyrus is the least threat (being slim and beardless) while Harry Potter's Hagrid is the main competitor based on body mass and beard. King Henry VIII and actor Brian Blessed also pose a threat.
Customer Profile
This section identifies the target audience. The wants and needs of the potential customer drive the brand.
In this case, the target audience consists of “people that believe”. A graph relates the age of a person to his/her believing in (1) Santa, (2) communism, and (3) God. The target audience consists of children up to 10-15 years. After 25, people don’t believe in Santa anymore…sorry *Santa*!
To read the *Santa* Brand Book of Quietroom, click here.
Monday, December 16, 2013
Snapchat – Clever Strategy Or Colossal Mistake?
Snapchat is the latest hot startup. It turned down a $3 billion buyout offer from Facebook (NASDAQ:FB). Interesting enough Snapchat hasn’t make any money up till now.
Needless to say, the move triggered a lot of speculation. It was assumed that Snapchat knows something that the rest of the world doesn’t.
Social media consultants and marketers pointing out that Snapchat is a great investing opportunity. However, it’s good to remember that Snapchat is not profitable. Facebook quite likely offered $3B to buy Snapchat in order to eliminate competition.
Snapchat might go down the path of Formspring or Chatroulette. It seems that Snapchat wants to become profitable via advertising. The idea is to make money by selling e.g., virtual goods. It’s doubtful that such a revenue model would match the Facebook offer.
According to The New Yorker's Matt Buchanan, Snapchat turned the money down since it is convinced that Snapchat will be worth more than $3b in the future. Since Snapchat doesn’t want to be another Instagram; it’s convinced that it’s worth more than the $1B.
The target audience of Snapchat is kids, not so much adults, who manage the purse strings.
Although Snapchat is definitely cool, I am not sure that they didn't make a huge mistake by turning down the Facebook offer.
Needless to say, the move triggered a lot of speculation. It was assumed that Snapchat knows something that the rest of the world doesn’t.
Social media consultants and marketers pointing out that Snapchat is a great investing opportunity. However, it’s good to remember that Snapchat is not profitable. Facebook quite likely offered $3B to buy Snapchat in order to eliminate competition.
Snapchat might go down the path of Formspring or Chatroulette. It seems that Snapchat wants to become profitable via advertising. The idea is to make money by selling e.g., virtual goods. It’s doubtful that such a revenue model would match the Facebook offer.
According to The New Yorker's Matt Buchanan, Snapchat turned the money down since it is convinced that Snapchat will be worth more than $3b in the future. Since Snapchat doesn’t want to be another Instagram; it’s convinced that it’s worth more than the $1B.
The target audience of Snapchat is kids, not so much adults, who manage the purse strings.
Although Snapchat is definitely cool, I am not sure that they didn't make a huge mistake by turning down the Facebook offer.
- Snapchat uses your existing address book on your phone until you opt out which is a problem with monetizing.
- Snapchat's technology is easy to replicate.
- Introducing ads will alienate users.
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Amazon’s Drone – The Next Marketing Frontier?
Somebody at Amazon must have watched “Almost Human”.
In the TV series episode 3, a drone delivers items to the hostage takers using a drone (which seems to be standard at that time).
Taking a leaf from JJ Abram’s playbook, the powers at Amazon have developed Prime Air.
Although definitely cool, I am not buying it. I think it’s a great marketing / branding ploy. Why?
1. Operating g a drone would require permission from the Federal Aviation Administration (FFA) for operating in US airspace. The FAA has said it will establish a set of regulations and standards for unmanned aircraft systems "over the next several years." Translation: good luck with that!
2. International deliveries are out of the question. Regular airplanes would still be faster and cheaper.
3. Any clever cybercrook can hack into the drone (just watch Castle episode 23 of season 5 for a demonstration!)
4. Kids, pets and bystanders could get hurt by the drone, triggering a tsunami of law suits.
5. Amazon could use the drone to “spy” on you, learning more about your habits and consumer patterns.
Even UPS, the world's largest parcel-delivery company, jumped on the hype and stated that it’s experimenting with various drone-based delivery solutions.
UPS stated: "The commercial use of drones is an interesting technology and we’ll continue to evaluate it. UPS invests more in technology than any other company in the delivery business and we’re always planning for the future."
Down Under, Australian Zookal, a textbook company, announced that it will start using drones to deliver its text books inside Sydney's Central Business District starting 2014.
It seems that even Bill Gates likes the drone idea; especially for delivering medication to remote areas.
But the main question remains – would it be profitable? I think it’s worth its weight in gold for PR and branding, but not so much in ROI.
It took Amazon several years to make its distribution and delivery system cost-effective. Point-to-point drone deliveries would only make sense if the customer would be willing to pay a premium for the service – similar to overnight deliveries. This could only work for delivery of special items; not for your average ordered book or DVD....
What do you think?
In the TV series episode 3, a drone delivers items to the hostage takers using a drone (which seems to be standard at that time).
Taking a leaf from JJ Abram’s playbook, the powers at Amazon have developed Prime Air.
Although definitely cool, I am not buying it. I think it’s a great marketing / branding ploy. Why?
1. Operating g a drone would require permission from the Federal Aviation Administration (FFA) for operating in US airspace. The FAA has said it will establish a set of regulations and standards for unmanned aircraft systems "over the next several years." Translation: good luck with that!
2. International deliveries are out of the question. Regular airplanes would still be faster and cheaper.
3. Any clever cybercrook can hack into the drone (just watch Castle episode 23 of season 5 for a demonstration!)
4. Kids, pets and bystanders could get hurt by the drone, triggering a tsunami of law suits.
5. Amazon could use the drone to “spy” on you, learning more about your habits and consumer patterns.
Even UPS, the world's largest parcel-delivery company, jumped on the hype and stated that it’s experimenting with various drone-based delivery solutions.
UPS stated: "The commercial use of drones is an interesting technology and we’ll continue to evaluate it. UPS invests more in technology than any other company in the delivery business and we’re always planning for the future."
Down Under, Australian Zookal, a textbook company, announced that it will start using drones to deliver its text books inside Sydney's Central Business District starting 2014.
It seems that even Bill Gates likes the drone idea; especially for delivering medication to remote areas.
But the main question remains – would it be profitable? I think it’s worth its weight in gold for PR and branding, but not so much in ROI.
It took Amazon several years to make its distribution and delivery system cost-effective. Point-to-point drone deliveries would only make sense if the customer would be willing to pay a premium for the service – similar to overnight deliveries. This could only work for delivery of special items; not for your average ordered book or DVD....
What do you think?
Labels:
almost human,
bill gates,
castle,
drone,
ffa,
jj abrams. amazon,
usp,
zookal
Saturday, December 07, 2013
To Hate Or Not To Hate – That’s The Facebook App Question
Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) recently launched a new app: "Hate with Friends". It allows Facebook users to “hate” their friends instead of removing them as a friend ( to “unfriend” them.
Once you as a Facebook user dislike one of your friends, you can hate that friend via the app. Once your friend hates you back, it shows on both your Facebook accounts.
By adding the app via the "Hate with Friends" website, you can build your very own hate list. You will see a button under each profile picture of your friends with the text "Hate-Him/Hate-Her".
With one click, your friend will be saved as your object of hate. Once your “friend” feels the same, Facebook will notify both of you about the mutual “hate”. It does not impact the friend status; both of you will still be Facebook friends.
Chris Baker developed the app for fun and explained that it should not be taken too seriously. He stated: “I think this anti-social stuff is the next big trend.”
It seems that a lot of Facebook users get the humor: the "Hate with Friends" site alone got already 6,000 Likes!
What do you think? Cool app or a waste of cyberspace?
By adding the app via the "Hate with Friends" website, you can build your very own hate list. You will see a button under each profile picture of your friends with the text "Hate-Him/Hate-Her".
With one click, your friend will be saved as your object of hate. Once your “friend” feels the same, Facebook will notify both of you about the mutual “hate”. It does not impact the friend status; both of you will still be Facebook friends.
Chris Baker developed the app for fun and explained that it should not be taken too seriously. He stated: “I think this anti-social stuff is the next big trend.”
It seems that a lot of Facebook users get the humor: the "Hate with Friends" site alone got already 6,000 Likes!
What do you think? Cool app or a waste of cyberspace?
Labels:
chris baker,
cyberspace,
facebook,
facebook app,
hate,
hate with friends,
humor,
social media
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)